Elena Sisto
Littlejohn Contemporary
October 15, 1998
By Douglas Maxwell
While looking at the new iconic portraits by Elena Sisto at Littlejohn,
I was struck by just how good a painter she is. Sisto demonstrates her
ability to paint in what amounts to an intentionally idiosyncratic style
applied to seemingly generic subjects.
At first, the compositions look rather simple- a single figure on an
abstract ground- but Sisto's brushwork is infused with a constant edginess
suggesting a psychological exploration is in order.The subjects here are
various stock charecters from fairy tales and lore, but rendered with
a twist making them Jungian archtypes. For example, Valiant, 1998stands
for the hero, and yet his lips are so red, it'sas if he is wearing lipstick.
Sisto seems intent on exploring how as children our imaginations create
a certain image of a fairy tale charecter which we then carry unchanged
into adulthood. One of Freud's most potent concepts was the repetition
compulsion which tells us how we are constantly making others into those
who we know from childhood (a mother, a father,a traumatizing figure)
and repeating behaviors with them with oftentimes less than positive results.
By personalizing her subjects, Sisto challenges these stereotypes. For
example, in the Giant's Son, 1988, a bully archetype, is a looming larger-than-life
figure who seems to have no idea what to do with his body. In fact, despite
his size, he seems bossed around and at the mercy of the space into which
Sisto has painted him. This leaves him being a real kid with plenty of
fragility and insecurity.
Then there is Finn McCool, 1998. I could not get over the mesmerizing
way Sisto has painted has painted his one eye (he is in profile). It is
blue and just a dab which gives the figure an uncanny three-dimensional
quality. Sisto told me that McCool is a mythical Irish giant, a hero figure,
who was actually not so brave. On being informed that another giant was
coming to get him, he was so frightened that he dressed up like a baby
so not to be identified. When the other giant saw Finn he thought that
if this baby was Finn's child, Finn himself must really be enormous, and
he got the hell out of there. In
Sisto's hands, McCool almost seems like a transvestite with very effeminate
features adding an ambivalent quality to his already reluctant character.
Like the Giant's son, he seems not to have a clue as to how he arrived
at his position in life. Sisto's female figures are just as compelling.
First I marvelled at the way the Princess, 1998 was composed. My immediate
impression was that she is a simple yet imposing figure on an abstract
monochromatic ground. But on closer examination, it becomes clear that
specific areas-her left shoulder for example-are painted in such a way
that they recede into a deeper space than than the background, creating
a visual complexity only matched by the psychological one. The princess
appears so troubled that somehow happily-ever-after hardly seems a possibility.
Perhaps the memory of the tragedy of Princess Di has left an indelible
mark on our collective psyches, creating a new stereotype for "the
princess". And like her male figures, Sisto's Princess' sex seems
a touch ambivalent. Does she or doesn't she have breasts?
In Princess and Stepmother, 1998, Sisto demonstrates that these stereotypes
which we use generation after generation to teach children good, bad,
and the myth of happily ever after are, in fact, more psychologically
complex. Why is the Princess always sweet and innocent and the Stepmother
always wicked? In fact, what's to prevent one of them from having both
roles? In the hands of Sisto, the roles are easily inter-changeable, but
isn't that the point when looking at archetypes (or following the repetition
compulsion)? Looks can be very deceiving. Finally, a last word about Sisto's
painting style. I have been following Sisto's work for several years,
back to when her paintings included cartoon charecters intermingled in
a stream of consciousness which she seemed to use to provide a freedom
and openness. I always felt that this style was better suited to Sisto's
drawings and that her paintings were one step behind. Now, her paintings
have taken a major leap. I cannot help but believe that the development
of her subject matter also was effected by circumstances in her own life.
The cartoon imagery seemed derived, at least in part, from the general
cultural milieu whereas now the portraits seem intentionally motivated,
no doubt in part driven by her own role as a mother.
By infusing a sense of freedom and looseness into her brushwork, and
combining it with the reduction of imagery to a single figure on a ground,
she has created works of resonant visual and psychological depth and freshness.
-------
|
|
Elena Sisto
Littlejohn Contemporary
by Ann Shostrom
In "Fairy Tales", Elena Sisto paints with a bold new simplicity.
Each canvas presents one character from the familiar stories against a
plain ground. Sisto pushes and pulls the paint, creating ambiguities of
pictorial space that opens up her paintings to deeper realms of interpretation
than previously available. The contrast between each character's static
pose and the dynamic paint handling provides the key to the real subject
of these portraits. Sisto's vigorous engagement with paint, laid down
a la prima, wet into wet, mimics the inner contortions that fue self-transformation.
Here, transformation is achieved through technique. By painting with precise
observation, she turns form into content. Stories of shape-shifting abound
in fairy tales. Sisto's characters appear to change gender or even species
before our eyes. This instability of the image is what underpins our complex
response. In Princess, a stark white ruff casts its pearly reflection
under the heroine's chin, who is otherwise in shadow. In this accurate
appraisal of a figure in a colored field, Sisto uses reflected light to
achieve believable space. She then turns this Princess sullen and reveals
a beast within the beauty. Prompted by another image, we imagine Prince
Valiant has come back from the wars a changed man. In the picture he is
coarsened, now a pig in a black suit. Yet there is tenderness in his stricken
expression. The broad animal features reveal a surprising delicacy of
feeling. Stepmother shows Sisto at her most confident as a painter. This
stark portrait emerges from darkness with striking effect. Her squared
eyes are almost sculptural, mysterious packages that, instead of seeing
outward, keep everything under wraps. As if screwed in too tightly, they
follow us, setting up an uncanny force field between painting and viewer
that collapses our eyes into hers. Sisto has conjured two images in one
in Stepmother, a demonic child fights for possession of the visage of
a \ hardened queen. Stepmother reminds us of Snow White's nemesis, who
looks into the mirrow, only to project her "inner child". Mistaking
her reflection for that of Snow White, she poisions the apple that she
will soon give the apparition of her youthful self. It is a tragedy of
misrecognition, a dialectical approach to fantasy that exposes our own
multiple realities.
Ann Shostrom is an artist and writer based in New York.----------
The New York Times
Art Guide
Friday, October 23, 1998
Elena Sisto, Littlejohn Contemporary, 41 East 57th Street, (212)-980-2323(Through
Nov. 7th). Cartoony portraits of strange, snub-nosed fairy tale
figures, including "Stepmother", "Giant's Son"
and "Prince Charming". Made on medium sized canvases,the
images have a rough-edged, faux-naive look, but they're lusciously
painted. You only wish Ms. Sisto, a good visual storyteller, would
fill in more of the narrative behind her cast of goofy
characters(Johnson).
|
©2002,ElenaSisto.com Elena
Sisto
All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or distribute in any form
without express permission.
|